top of page

Test Cell

Validity Proven

Page as a Pdf.png

Nikola Tesla discovered that the electrostatic emission surface of a conductor will always concentrate where the surface is curved, or where it has an edge. While steeper the curve, or corner, the higher the concentration of electron emission is.
Tesla also noted that an electrostatic charge will flow over the surface of a conductor rather than penetrate it. This is referred to as the Faraday Effect   or skin effect discovered by Michael Faraday.

Stanley A Meyer used this knowledge to make the world most efficient Voltolysis units. Now you know too.
Brought to you by Daniel and the Secure Supplies team.

 

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

There are thousands of builders now globally,

We invite you to invest and join in to also support the rise of this technology.

We show h2 some examples of the work carried out proving the technology rebuilding it and now mass deployment.

Do you self and mankind a favor download this page and        Re upload to new websites, and pass to schools.

Hydrogen Hot Rod

Powered by   High Voltage, High Frequency nano pulses.

The WFC is a water capacitor and uses ORDINARY TAP WATER without any electrolyte...

Voltrolysis cells should always be in series pairs 
Stanley A Meyer Voltrolysis cells Wiring.jpeg
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

January 25, 2013 - TESTS02E01 :

Following the TEST  about the production of HHO gas,

I have continued the tests with the Stanley Meyer's Water Fuel Cell (WFC).

 

The TEST has demonstrated that High Voltage Nano Pulses at High Frequency produced   accross an electrolysis cell are able to produce very quickly a great amount of HHO gas.

 

According to these encouraging tests, I have reconducted my experiments done about the Stanley Meyer's WFC from June 2008.

 

 I have replaced the VIC (Voltage Intensifier Circuit), a replication of the   Stanley A  Meyer's circuit,  with 100% positive results.

 

Dan

"I encourage all schools and builders to replicate and teach such technologies aggressively."

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Notes : 

The use of pure osmosed water without electrolyte (not electrically conductible) is very important here, this has allowed to remove completly the HHO generation by electrolysis.

AS ZERO  SALTS ZERO ELECTROLYTES ONLY PURE OSMOSED WATER.

The WFC is a water capacitor, in this test it consumes too much current due to its impedance Vs the pulsed current.

 

During long duration tests (>6min) the WFC begins to heat up and thus, this confirms this fact. The effect discovered by Stanley Meyer seems really present here, because the pure osmosed water is split.

Stanley A Meyer First Test Cell in KItchen.png

Saved from  Home Video Stanley A Meyer first Test Cell in his kitchen

Stanley A Meyer Water Fuel Hot Rod.jpg

The High Voltage pulse sent by the induction  accross the WFC via the flat bifilar coil need to be optimized so as to reduce the current. I think that the WFC must be used as a capacitor in a resonant RLC type circuit like the Meyer's VIC original circuit..SEE  9XB  and    9XA Pages

THE PARAMETRIC POWER CONVERSION
 
Created on April 16th, 1997 - JLN Labs - Last update : January 10th, 2003
Thanks to Fred B. EppsGreg WatsonEpitaxy


All informations in this page are published free and are intended for private/educational purposes and not for commercial applications

As shown by Equation #1, electromotive force, and hence the transfer of electrical energy can be achieved in two ways:

 

(1) by flux coupling,

or

(2) by parametric coupling.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Equation #1
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Figure 1 

Consider a simple inductance (L) carrying a current (i) as shown in fig 1.

One knows that there is energy stored in this inductance of magnitude 1/2 LI*2 and if this inductance is now increased in some manner, such as by inserting an iron core into L (while holding I constant). then the stored electrical energy is increased. This is an example of parametric power transfer. (see Equation 1).

Hydrogen Hot Rod

Specials comments :

"NO energy is required to insert the iron core into the inductor.

 

It is ATTRACTED into the core and the resultant increased coil energy is pumped back into the power source (coil current drops)!" (Greg Watson)

"No mechanical energy input is required to insert the iron core into the inductor, BECAUSE iron core is attracted by the inductor itself, thus no mechanical energy need to be expended !" (Epitaxy)

If in accordance whith Fig 2, the afore-mentionned core is now alternately inserted into and withdrawn from the inductance L and this inductance is, in turn a part of tank circuit, then a parametric oscillator result.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Figure 2

The most critical relationship associated with this parametric oscillator relate to frequency. For such devices, it is a well known fact that ideally, the pumping frequency (rotating eccentric) should be twice the frequency to which the resonant tank is tuned ( fig 3 ).

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Fig 3

The following example demonstrate the general validity of this statement :

Assume that the current in the tank is oscillating at one-half the frequency of rotating eccentric ( see fig 4 ).

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Fig 4

Current in LC Tank

Hydrogen Hot Rod

Referring to fig 4, if the core is inserted at point (1) in the cycle, this increase in L, coupled with the large current flowing at that time, results in a large parametric energy transfer from the mechanism to the circuit.

 

Furthermore, if the core is now withdrawn one-half of a mechanical cycle later (or one-quarter of an electrical cycle at point (2), the current is now zero and no electrical energy is withdraw from the tank. Similarly at point (3) we have additional parametric energy transfer and at (4) no transfer.

 

Thus, by doubling the pumping frequency, power can be unilaterally transferred parametrically in accordance with the second term of Equation 1.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Fig 5
Parametric amplification of energy

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Fig 6
Transient state

( start of parametric amplification )

In the example cited above, a mechanical driver was used. The final step, of course, is to achieve a simple passive all-electrical parametric device in which the double frequency pumping action is an intrinsic part of the device.

( Ref document : The PARAFORMER (TM), "A new passive power conversion device" by Dr S.D.Wanlass and Dr L.K. Wanlass )

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Below the details of the WFC cell used for this
"proof of concept" experiment.
WFC Water Fuel Cell Capacitor Stanley A
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Test Cells Single Tube

Preliminary tests of the 1st WFC v1.0 ( June 12, 2008):

Below, the video of the experimental WFC v1.0 working in resonance mode with distilled water. A high flow of gases is produced at the WFC v1.0 resonance frequency.

 

You may notice that, in this case, the size of the bubbles produced are very tiny compared to a common electrolysis process.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Here is the Water Fuel Cell, the most important thing is that the WFC uses only ORDINARY TAP WATER without need of ELECTROLYTE for working properly. The stainless steel electrodes are the main parts of a water capacitor.

Stanley A Meye WFC Water Fuel Cell.jpg
The High Frequency is rectified via an ultra fast HFA25PB60 diode so as to produce High Frequency DC pulses accross the WFC.
Stanley A Meye WFC Water Fuel Cell Diode

The full datasheet of the diode can be found HERE

Below the details of the WFC cell used for this "proof of concept" experiment.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Parametric Resonance

This demonstration illustrates parametric resonance, which is a resonance phenomenon that arises because some parameter of the system is varying periodically in time.

 

This happens, for example, when you periodically extend and retract your legs at an appropriate frequency while sitting on a playground swing. If a pendulum consists of a mass connected to a frictionless hinge by an idealized rod of length L, then the angle θ between the rod and vertical obeys the differential equation

θ" + (g/L) sinθ=0

If the length of the pendulum varies with time, the differential equation becomes

θ" + 2(L'(t)/L(t))θ'+(g/L(t)) sinθ=0

In this Applet, we choose the length of the pendulum to be L(t)=1+A cos(wt) and we choose g=4π2. With this choice of g, solutions of the A=0, linearized equation θ"+gθ=0 have period 1.

At time t, the length of the blue line in the Applet below is L(t). The angle between the blue line and vertical is θ(t). For comparison purposes, the gray pendulum provides the same data for the A=0, g=4π2, linearized equation

θ" + g θ =0

So, at time t, the length of the gray line is 1 and the angle between the gray line and vertical is a constant (determined by the initial speed that I have chosen) times sin(2πt).

The demonstration below is an applet. Google Chrome, Firefox and Microsoft Edge no longer execute applets because of security issues with NPAPI plugins. Some browsers that still play applets are Internet Explorer,

Safari and the Pale Moon browser [ windows, linuxMac ].

easy.

WFC Water Fuel Cell Capacitor Stanley A

Parametric resonance tests of the WFC at 2*fo and at 0.5*fo :

Stanley A Meeyer WFC Tests.jpg

When the frequency of the pump is set to Fpump = 2*fo = 1.110 MHz
the resonance of the WFC is fo= 0.687 Mhz

Stanley A Meeyer WFC Tests1.jpg

When the frequency of the pump is set to Fpump = 0.5*fo = 0.329 MHz
the resonance of the WFC is fo= 0.560 Mhz

Stanley Meyers's

Water Fuel Technology Works

Stanley A Meyers Technology Works.jpg

Test of WFC v1.1 with an insulated Cathode

DBD Barrier

Stanley A Meyer Watr Fuel Cell DBD Barri

The center electrode of the WFC v1.0 has been covered with a thin adhesive plastic sheet so has to get a fully insulated cathod.

Thank You Hydrogen Hot Rodders.

So, it is now possible to get the Voltage Intensification with an electrical step charging effect.

Below the measured specs of the new insulated WFC v1.1.

SPECIAL BUILDER NOTE

There is a little error here the Cathod should be the outer tube and the liner on the inside of outter tube.

Reason is we want the larger + Surface are of the Outter Tube and the Smaller Negative surface on the centre -negative Annode

Stanley A Meyer Meter.jpg
Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope.jpg

Above 

: The WFC 1.1 has been tested with 30V

squared pulses at 105 Hz.
When the voltage is switched off, the WFC acting as a water capacitor, discharges on itself.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope 1.jpg

A 246 mH coil have been connected in parallel with the WFC v1.1 at the output of the VIC circuit.

Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope 2.jpg

The voltage can be stepped up to 1.4 kV peak-peak at 13 kHz

Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope 3.jpg

Above : The WFC v1.1 is charged through a 9.89 kOhms resistor with the DC power supply. Now, the WFC v1.1 act as a true capacitor.


The calculated value from the curve ( 4.7 nF ) is nearly close to the measured value with the digital capacimeter ( 5.19 nF ).

Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope 4.jpg

Above : The WFC capacitor is disconnected from the DC power supply, its discharges on itself.


It is interesting to notice that the calculated value ( 196 kOhms) from the curve of the internal
resistance of the WFC v1.1 is less than the measured value with the digital multimeter ( 2.9 MOhms ).

Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope 5.jpg

Above : The WFC v1.1 is charged with the VIC, you see clearly the stepping charge effect.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley  Meyer WFC Waterr Fuel Cell Sing
Stanley A Meyer Distilled Water
Stanley A Meyer Distilled Water

The T1 transformer is a common 220v/12v 60VA transformer used in reverse mode.

 

The use of a toroïdal transformer with a ferrite core will be better to minimize the HF losses in the core.

 

The T2 transformer uses a bifilar coils as described below :

Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope 6.jpg
Stanley A Meyer Meter Scope 7.jpg
Stanley A Meyer Distilled Water

Above : The VIC ( Voltage Intensifier Circuit ) is now working.

 

The WFC v1.1 is charged up to 1.1 KV in stepping charge.

Notes : With the design v1.1, I haven't yet got the same density of bubbles observed in the v1.0, the WFC v1.1 has been designed so as to get a true capacitor, the stepping charge effect can be observed has Stanley Meyer as described in his technical notes and his patent.

The adiabatic charge effect of this water ca

pacitor is very important because it minimizes de losses by Joules effect in the circuit during the charging process, so the energy transfert in the WFC is optimal.

I am currently building a new WFC v2, I shall soon publish all the infos and the datas, stay tuned...

Documents and references :

Method for the production of a fuel gas
No. Publication (Sec.) :US4936961
Date de publication :1990-06-26
Inventeur :MEYER STANLEY (US)  
Déposant :MEYER STANLEY (US) 

Abstract of US4936961

A method for obtaining the release of a fuel gas mixture including hydrogen and oxygen from water in which the water is processed as a dielectric medium in an electrical resonant circuit.

Stanley A Meyer Distilled Water
Stanley A Meyer VIC Proven Correct Valid Right

 TESTS02E03 : Here is a very interesting test which tends to proof the working principle of the Water Fuel Cell invented by Stanley Meyer.

 

The purpose of this test is to completly remove the electrolyse effect and keep only the parametrical elongation effect of the water molecule as writen by Stanley A Meyer in his

. The WFC is filled in this test with pure osmosed water (equivalent to distilled water).

 

So, the water used is not electrically conductive and can be compared to a dielectric. If, in this case, the HHO gas is produced, this can only be done with the Stanley Meyer's principle : by using the cracking of the water molecule produced by the parametrical elongation of the hydrogen-oxygen covalent bound The electrical characteristics of the Water Fuel Cell filled with a pure osmosed water are measured with a digital multimeter.

WFC Water Fuel Cell Capacitor Stanley A

 In this test, the DC pulsed voltage and the current are measured accross the input of the WFC, just after the fast switching diode HFA25PB60.

 

The voltage accross the WFC is measured with the scope proble Ch1 (X10) and the current is computed by measuring the voltage accross a 0.1 Ohm non inductive metal resistor 10W Mundorf MR10 via the scope probe Ch2 (X10). The sampling rate of the digital oscilloscope is set to 100 MSa/sec.

 

The measurements datas are sent to a PC and then computed on Octave (an Opensource of MatLab) with the power_calc v1.02 software.

The electrical characteristics of the Water Fuel Cell filled with a pure osmosed water are measured with a digital multimeter.

Measure your cells all of them for capacitence and understand them 

Example of recording 6 cell assembly capcitence

Cell_Dimensions.jpg
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Circuit 9XB 8xa Choke Water Fuel
Stanley A Meyer Water Fuel Cell Voltrolysis Wet

Parts for making the STANLEY A MEYER 8XA/9XB Circuit 
this is a part list for the boards that we salevvminor changes from the originalv.less expensive and easier to find componates 

9XB parts list 

  • bridged rectifier, not sure of the number

       (only needed if you will use a transformer of 7 to 36 volts.)

        Use a 12 volt or 9 volt battery other wise 

  • KBU808G bridged rectifier 

  • 3 x 1000uf caps 

  • 7805 regulator 

  • .1 uf cap 

  • 330 uf cap 

  • .01 uf cap 

  • 10nf 

  • 1k , 10m. 4.7k X2 parts, 220R x 3 parts... resisters 1/4 w 

  • 4 position dip switch 

  • H11D1 opto 

  • 555 timer chip 

  • 3 x 74LS90N decade counter 

  • 7404 invert chip 

  • red Led 

  • 1 100k pot 

 

SCR  (SWITCH) part list 

  • KBU808G bridged rectifier 

  • 100 ohm resistor (20 watt or so) 

  • S4025L 

       (or simular use a heat sink and make sure the pin out matches) 

  • 1N4007 diode 

  • 6 Amp 1000 volt diode 

  • H11D2 and 220 resistor

       ( not needed if using the 9xa or the 9xb) 

NOTES FROM MILLER 

0 v limit....
If 12 volt supplied to a regulator chip.... 2 volts is lost in the chip.
The 9xd has a 12 volt and 5 volt regulator.
12 volt regulator needs 14 volt or more to output 12 volt.
A car runs on 14.5 volts. 
At rest the battery is 12 volts. So a 12 volt regulator outputs 10 volts.
A 2 volt drop through the regulator

===========================
he's taking about typical voltage regulator. 
Don't get confused about low drop out voltage 
regulators which don't have 2 v drop but they
also can't handle as much flow/current
===========
Lm317 is an adjustable regulater. 1.5 amp. 1.2 volts to 34 volts or so.
Has a 2 volt drop.
Other regulators would be buck or boost converters

7810 is a 10volt reg
Lm317 is and adjustable reg. You can make 
it a fixed voltage reg. A switch to a resistor.... 
Say 3 different resistors... 
This would output 3 different voltages. 
Preselected with the switch

One lm317 or 78xx series chips are 1.5 amps. 
Simply wire in parallel.... 2 chips are 3 amps...
 Same voltage outputs

An opamp....
Basically a voltage follower. 
There are different things they can do.
Mostly used as voltage followers..... Or amplifiers.
With a center tapped power supply.... 
They output a AC wave. Say a microphone amplifier.
With just Dc input... It will out put a DC wave.

These are simple answers. Not trying to get complex 

You also have neg voltage regulators.
Compliments to the 78xx and lm317 packages.
You need center tapped transformers for that.
Again.... This is a simplified answer.

You also. Need to pay attention to the ground icon.
For example.... Earth ground...... Chassis ground...
Ground reference...

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

The WFC BOOSTER (Stanley Meyer's Water Fuel Cell)
The saison 2 of the project GEGENE (Great Efficiency GENErator)...
created on december 28, 2012 - JLN Labs - last update february 7, 2013


All informations and diagrams are published freely (freeware) 
Toutes les informations et schémas sont publiés gratuitement ( freeware ) 

Cliquez ici pour la version FRANCAISE 

This is the following of the GEGENE project which uses the interesting characteristicss of a falt bifilar Tesla coil with an induction cooker as a High Frequency and High Power generator. TThe main specification of the GEGENE (Great Efficiency GENErator) is that it uses a BIFILAR PANCAKE COIL patented by Nikolas TESLA in 1894 in the patent N° 512,340. In the GEGENE the flat bifilar coil is electromagnetically coupled with the main flat coil of the induction cooker and acts as the secundary coil for the output.

 

The driving and the controlling are fully done by the main electronic controller of the induction cooker itself. So, no special electronic equipment or laboratory measurement tools are required here to succeed in this experiment. You need only : an induction cooker (for less than 50€), a dual flexible wire (speaker wire or grid wire) and some electrical connectors and plugs...

Introducing the WFC Booster project

The main purpose of the WFC Booster is trying to generate efficiently, and with a great amount, a HHO gaz (a stoechiometric mixture) which can be used as an alternative fuel.

 

The process used here is based on the WFC (Water Fuel Cell) invented by Stanley Meyer in 1990 and which consist to broke the water molecule by a parametric elongation of the hydrogen-oxygen bond.

 

This parametric elongation of the water molecule, according to the Stanley Meyer principle, is done by using High Voltage nano pulses at high frequency accross a cylindrical capacitor immersed in water.

 

The main particularity of the Stanley Meyer's WFC is that it uses the ordinary tap water without any add of electrolyt like a common electrolyser. Below some pages of the initial Stanley Meyer patent which shows the working principle of the Water Fuel Cell :

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

ere a video of the Stanley Meyer's (WFC) Water Fuel Cell in Action (close view) powered by the GEGENE with High Voltage, High Frequency nanopulses. The WFC is a water capacitor and uses ORDINARY TAP WATER without any electrolyte...

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Patent replication 3.jpg

 TEST   S02E05 

We have observed in the previous test, that it is possible to use the GEGENE abovee as a pulsed current generator to power the Stanley Meyer's WFC. The previous test has showed that a great amount of stoechometric mixture is produced with a pure osmosed water without electrolyte but with too much current (10A). This strong current produced the heating of the water after few minutes. In this test, the induction cooker of the Gegene has been replaced by a double function generator (one modulating the other) and the flat bifilar coil by a cylindrical bifilar coil ( 2x1mH ) with a ferrite core.

Stanley Meyer INductor for Waterr Fuel M

Reproduced the VIC (Voltage Intensifier Circuit) signal of Stanley Meyer with the two function generators so as to get a parametrical excitation of the water molecule of the WFC and also to get a similar flow of gaz equivalent to the TESTS02E04.

Stanley Meyer Bifilar Test  Inductor Wat

Below the setup of the TEST-S02E05 :

Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking
Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking

The function genarator N°1 modulate the function generator N°2 and the signal is sent to the power amplifier with a Mosfet transistor IRFP450 and powered at 30 V DC.
The pulsed voltage is sent to WFC via an ultra fast diode HFA25PB60 and through the bifilar coil (L1,L2).

Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking

Two analog multimeters are used to measure the DC voltage and the DC current powering the amplifier.

Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking

Below The DC power supply confirms the DC voltage and current measured.

Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking

Below the signal measured accross the WFC.

Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking
Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking

The MAX voltage measured is 560 Volt and with this kind of pulsed current the amount of gaz is equivalent to the 1 KW of power sent by the GEGENE...

Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking
Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking
Stanley Meyer Lab Tested Valid Worrking

Comments : This test shows that it is possible to reduce dramatically the current spent (and thus the Joule losses) in the WFC by using a special pulsed signal...

Can we Tested the Gated PWM that Driver VIC?

TEST-S02E06 : Improvement of the parametric wave measured accross the WFC
The saison 2 of the Projet GEGENE (Great Efficiency GENErator)...
created on december 28, 2012 - JLN Labs - last update february 7, 2013
All informations and diagrams are published freely (freeware) and are intended for a private use and a non commercial use.


Toutes les informations et schémas sont publiés gratuitement ( freeware ) et sont destinés à un usage personnel et non commercial

Cliquez ici pour la version FRANCAISE 

 

February 6, 2013 - TESTS02E06 : This is the following of the TESTS02E05. The purpose of this test is to be the closest as possible to the parametric excitation wave which is able to broke the covalent bound of the water molecule as Stanley Meyer has discribed in his patent (see below) :

Here a test of the Stanley Meyer's Water Fuel Cell (WFC) with the VIC circuit v1.1. The WFC is filled with pure osmosed water without electrolyte The purpose of this test is to get the water molecule splitting by resonance with the stepping charge effect as described in the Stanley Meyer's patent.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

The Voltage Intensifier Circuit (VIC) uses the same components from the previous test,

I have updated the previous diagram by adding a new ultra-fast switching diode (thanks to Milan Manchich for his suggestion).

And effectivly, in this new setup, the measured signal accross the WFC is very similar to the Stanley Meyer's patent.

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Below the updated diagram of the WFC-VIC 1.1

Here the setup of the TEST-S02E06 :

Stanley A Meyer VIC Circuit JL 2.jpg
Stanley A Meyer VIC Circuit JL 3.jpg
Stanley A Meyer Patent replication 4.jpg

he function genarator N°1 modulate the function generator N°2 and the signal is sent to the power amplifier with a Mosfet transistor IRFP450 and powered at 30 V DC.
The pulsed voltage is sent to WFC via the two ultra fast diodes HFA25PB60 and through the bifilar coil (L1,L2).

The resonance frequency has been tuned to 42.8 KHz modulated at 4.2 KHz with a DTC of 50%

Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol
Stanley A Meyer Single Test Cell Voltrol

Here the signal measured accross the WFC.

Stanley A Meyer Voltage 1.jpg
Stanley A Meyer Voltage 2.jpg

Comments : 

The new signal generated is more closer to the signal described in the Stanley Meyer's patent.

 

This new setup seems to improve significantly the splitting of the water molecule. It is important to notice that I have not observed the warming up of the water.

Support us on Patreon PLease Dan 

https://www.patreon.com/securesupplies

48052387_810901672586139_791454764321944

Special Note if  10 KHZ up you will get no bubbles

if Dc bounces to ac no bubbles

why Stanlley A meyer voltrolysis does no work
Stanley A Meyer Cells Voltrolysis

Andrija Puharich`s Circuit diagram

 •6 May 2017

Stanley and Stephen Meyer based some of their circuit thoughts on Andrija Puharich`s

and Nikola Tesla's circuit Works.

 

 

Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator

Andrija Puharich`s Patent US4394230A: https://www.google.com/patents/US4394230

 

Andrija Puharich`s Patent US3563246: https://www.google.com/patents/US3563246

 

Andrija Puharich`s Patent US3726762: https://www.google.com/patents/US3726762

My "Old" Circuit diagram: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

My "Improved" Circuit diagram: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

Andrija Puharich`s Wave Form: https://patentimages.storage.googleap...

Патент US4394230A,here

от мен на български език:

back up 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator
Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator

Andrija Puharich`s Water Decomposition Waveform - Part 1

 

•29 Apr 2017

 

Andrija Puharich`s Patent US4394230A: https://www.google.com/patents/US4394230

 

Патент US4394230A, преведен от мен на български език:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

My Circuit diagram: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

Amplitude modulation - 3 frequencies is present:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

Double Amplitude modulation - only 2 frequencies is present:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

The Original Sound of Stanley Meyer`s Waveform:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbk5P...

 

(I publish this my "Sound analysis", 5 years ago. This Sound... is the same!!!)

 

Similar research forum`s link: http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php?...

 

Molecular Geometry of the Water molecule:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbCSa...

 

Nuclear Magnetic Spin Relaxation Time Constant of Water T1 = T2 = 2500 mS = 2,5 sec: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...

 

Stephen Meyer`s "Frequency deviation", by changing Car Alternator`s RPM:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

Another one Puharich`s calculation, at "dry cell" (not water added): "fc"

average = 62985 Hz, with ranges between 59748 Hz to 66221 Hz, 66221 Hz - 62985 Hz

= 3236 Hz (about +5,1%) 62985 Hz - 59748 Hz = 3237 Hz (about -5,1%)

 

Therefore, Carrier Resonant Sinusoidal signal = 62985 Hz, modulated with "Audio signal"

= 3236 Hz This wave form is shown in FIG.5:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

Nuclear Spin and controlling Relaxation time

and magnetic effects on H2 and O

In NMR, a strong magnetic field is used to partially polarize the nuclear spins.

 

Taking protons as the most common example, the excess of proton spin in the direction of the magnetic field constitutes a small net magnetization of the material.

 

To set up the conditions for the observation of an NMR signal, strong radio frequency radiation is applied to the sample at the appropriate frequency to

produce "spin flips". From the quantum point of view, the RF photons

are absorbed by some of the protons to flip them from parallel to the magnetic

field to anti-parallel, a higher energy state.

When the exciting RF field is switched off, the protons tend to returned to their lower energy state. This "relaxation" back to a state where their spins are parallel to the static magnetic field produces a small amount of RF radiation which is detected as the NMR signal. Two different time constants for decay are typically observed.

The longer of the two time constants is usually labeled T1 and is associated with the decay of the field component that is parallel to the applied static magnetic field B0.

 

This field direction is usually taken to define the z-axis of the system.

 

This time constant is sometimes called the longitudinal time constant. It is also called the spin-lattice relaxation time.

Since the magnetic potential energy is proportional to the projection along this axis, a change in the magnetization along this axis involves the exchange of energy.

This implies that the spin has interacted with its environment.

For application to magnetic resonance imaging of the body, the interaction is a good thing because it implies the capacity to differentiate between different types of tissue.

The Original Sounds of Andrija Puharich`s and Stanley A Meyers

Basic Systems.  Remember there are over 11 Version all work.

This is VERSION 1 sound Recorded 16 Dec 2012

( sounds like a frog aree they releasing oxygen into the water ?)

Gods handy Work ?

 

Frogs at Rest Sound, it is not a mating call

or call it is a at rest sound.

 

Andrija Puharich`s Water Decomposition Waveform - Part 2

 

•29 Apr 2017

 

Link to my previous video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQVtF...

 

Andrija Puharich`s Patent US4394230A: https://www.google.com/patents/US4394230

 

Патент US4394230A, преведен от мен на български език: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

My Circuit diagram: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

Amplitude modulation - 3 frequencies is present:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

Double Amplitude modulation - only 2 frequencies is present: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

The Original Sound of Stanley Meyer`s Waveform: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbk5P...

 

(I publish this my "Sound analysis", 5 years ago. This Sound... is the same!!!) Similar research forum`s link: http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php?...

 

Molecular Geometry of the Water molecule:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbCSa...

 

Nuclear Magnetic Spin Relaxation Time Constant of Water T1 = T2 = 2500 mS = 2,5 sec: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...

 

Stephen Meyer`s "Frequency deviation", by changing Car Alternator`s RPM: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

Another one Puharich`s calculation, at "dry cell" (not water added):

"fc" average = 62985 Hz, with ranges

between 59748 Hz to 66221 Hz, 66221 Hz - 62985 Hz = 3236 Hz

(about +5,1%) 62985 Hz - 59748 Hz = 3237 Hz (about -5,1%)

Therefore, Carrier Resonant Sinusoidal signal = 62985 Hz,

modulated with "Audio signal" = 3236 Hz

 

This wave form is shown in FIG.5: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxn...

 

Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator
Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator
Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator
Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator
Andrija Puharich`s Blocking oscillator

Beyond Advanced

How the Covalent OFF Switch works! Radiant Energy is basically Back-EMF Im-Pulses & the purpose of the 8XA Tesla Choke is to dampen these Back-EMF Im-Pulses from detonating (Exploding) the Water.

 

Meyer explains that the High Voltage Field induces ‘Electron Movement’ within the Water Molecules/Atoms causing the Water to Split. In 2005 Naohiro Shimuzu had discovered that ultra-short pulses with a width of 300ns has the ability to Split Water.

 

The dominant theory in Darwin, NT Australia is that, of a Bloch Wall being a pure Potential Field that exists that effects the Covalent Bond Electrons & this causes the Water to breakdown into its HHO constituent Gases.

 

All you do is you take Water & you expose it to Radiant Energy (Back EMF Im-Pulses) & you get FREE Electricity by the WFC acting as a Converter compressing this Radiant Energy into Amperage & a by-product of this process is FREE HHO Gases...

 

Basically if NO Electrons are entering from the Cathode, then the Electrons are ‘RIPPED’ from the Water to fill the Holes in the Anode & as you pull these Covalent Bond Electrons from the Water, the Water Molecules will Break Down into its constituent HHO Gases. First you’ll have an Ionisation when Water loses one Electron & then you’ll get a Dis-Association when they lose two Electrons.

 

All the Electrons are built up & then they’re drawn off from the Circuit into a Light Bulb & optional Battery Array in what is known as the ‘Electron Extraction Circuit'.

 

So you get FREE DC Current off the WFC in direct proportion to the amount of HHO Gases that is produced (NO Electrons enter the WFC but, then manifest themselves upon Switch Closure).

 

You could have a Water Fuel Cell & the Current that comes off this Charges a Light Bulb & then a Battery Array & these Batteries could then be connected to an Inverter that then Powers an entire House/Boat ect.

 

Allot of people have already used these extracted Electrons from Water to power Motors & Fans. Most people look at it this way Water is Firstly an un-limited supply of Electrons & Secondly as a by product of this

 

'Electron Extraction Process' produces massive amounts of HHO Gases produced by the Amperage moving through the Water via the 'Short Circuit' conversion of stored Back-EMF Charge into Amperage.

 

My 3.25 Kva Generator is powered by 12 Volts at 3.3 Amps = 40 Watts on the Primary Side of my Anti-Parallel Dual 3.0 Ohm Ignition Coils.

 

The calculated Back-EMF Output of this is 40 Kilo-Volts at 1 Milli-Amp = 40 Watts. Allot of people just Oscillate the Anti-Parallel Ignition Coil setup with a 20 Kilohertz Signal & then use Meyer LC Resonance as the ON/OFF Gate to alternate between the 8XA Charging of the WFC & the Short Circuit of the WFC which removes Electrons from the Water & releases HHO Gases.

 

This setup produces WAY, WAY more HHO than I could possibly need to power my 3.25 Kva Generator. This is the Power input as stated in Meyers New Zealand Maori Meeting House Lecture that is used by WFC replicators in both Auckland, North Island of New Zealand & in Darwin, NT Australia.

 

On my 3.25 KVA Generator all I do is generate the HHO Gas & then I re-circulate the Exhaust Gases & Negatively Charge this Exhaust 'Nitrous Oxide' then feed this Ionised Exhaust Gases back into the intake. It can be a Closed System where I'm only inputing HHO Gases & the only Output from the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) is Water Vapour (Steam).

 

Most people that have these Devices in Darwin just tend to tell other Random Kient's that it doesn't work or that they haven't powered anything off it (ie: their Cars V8 Engine or Harley Davidson) yet otherwise,

they'll just be harassed by people (I want one too) either too STUPID to build one for themselves or just like to Theorise (Talk SHIT!) about the inner workings of Stanley Meyer Technology when its all clearly explained in Stanley Meyers 'Birth of New Technology'. It’s NOT Rocket Science…

THIS SHIT IS SIMPLE!

 

Walter Russell in the 'The Universal One' (1927) states that Gas production is dependent on the Voltage electric stream as it displaces substances by accumulating (gravitationally) the universal constant under increasingly higher pressure equilibriums. It is the absence of the (Amperage) magnetic stream to defuse that solidity into tenuity by releasing those higher pressures. A Channeled book written by a Spiritualist, published in 1927 reveals the secret to an Un-Limited supply of Hydrogen from Water.

To SIMPLIFY how a Stanley Meyer Water Fuel Cell works & remains Cold even after Hours/Days of continuous operations... When YOU Charge a Capacitor the Capacitor will become Hot because it is the Load. If you take the Energy from a Charged Capacitor & run a Motor the Motor will become Hot because the Motor is the Load.

 

A Stanley Meyer Water Fuel Cell Capacitor is Charged with Back-EMF Im-Pulses & then is Gated to provide 'OFF' Short Circuit periods in which the WFC Capacitor is Short Circuited into a Load which is usually a Light Bulb... While I was in Darwin I was fortunate enough to come across some Technicians that had Powered Fan Motors with the Short Circuits Gating of Stanley Meyer Fuel Cells- This Energy can even Charge 'Off Grid' Battery Arrays!

Learned Mind could Test this with as little as $100. to build two Circuits to Charge & Discharge a Water Fuel Cell (WFC) Capacitor in Figure 1-14 Electron Extraction Circuit (of Stans Book).

 

The WFC 1.0 Software uses the Dielectric Values in Meyers Memo 7 Figure 7-15: Thermal Explosive Energy of Water, Analysis of Water. Distilled Water works best because it holds the most Charge before it reaches Catastrophic Failure of the Water Dielectric.

 

The greater the Stored Charge in the Water Dielectric, the more efficient the creation of HHO Gases is during these OFF 'Short Circuits' that both extract Covalent Bond Electrons from the Water & then release massive amounts of HHO gases. Water cannot exist as a Liquid without the Covalent Bond Electrons have been removed & therefore must exist as its constituent HHO Gases.

MOT.png
tttt.jpg
lll.jpg
sss.jpg
This Builder basically used a SCR Switch to chop main power he used very similar components to the scre in switch pages.  here is his list.
Z1.png
Stanley A Meyer SCR Switch Cell
This Builder basically used a Dave Lawton circuit as he states in video it is alittle more static in signal but still works. 
zzz.jpg

"The WFC Circuit is just a Rectifier & Two ‘Stanley Meyer High Voltage Switches’ where one Switch Charges the WFC Gated at LC Resonance with an 8XA Coil & the other Switch ‘Short Circuits’ the WFC & by-passes the 8XA Coil at LC Resonance into an external ‘Light Bulb & Battery Array’ Load as the Electron Extraction Circuit… A Variable Inductor is used for Tuning the Circuit. This is Very SIMPLE & will produce a Minimum of 300% Faraday’s to 1,700% Faraday’s simple Electrolysis at around 0.05 Amps or 1/20th of an Amp… Once this is understood, you can start using Toroids, Ignition Coils or Tesla Coils."



"All you need is the 'Potential and the Frequency'. The Electrons can come from the Power (Enslavement) Grids Neutral, an Earthed Rod in your Back Yard or the Covalent Bonds in Water itself. In Auckland New Zealand and Darwin of Australia people have been using the 'LIVE' Phase connection from the Power Grid and an Earthed Rod as a Neutral to power their Hydrponic Lights for years... In New Zealand a guy in debt to a Motor Cycle Gang gave them A Box that when connected to a 'LIVE'  Phase and a separate Earth powered a Warehouse with Electrons from the Earth ...All your interested in is the Potential and Frequency


Just look at (Google) 'A Vector Potentials'.?
If you have the original Lawton PLL you can hook up to any switch directly from the Diode Light to an optociuple. If you have the original SCR you can hook the Diode Light up to the side connections that you'd normally connect any Frequency Generator to.?

 


So you have your Dave Lawton Pll just remove the Switch and connect three wires that you can then connect to your optocouple. Easy!... you really need to Switch BACK-EMF Im-Pulses and not Hot Electricity from a Variac.?
If you understand how to remove the LED and hook it to your SCR then all you do is build two SCR Circuits and instead of using an SCR you pick out a PNP and an NPN so you get an alternation using the same signal. So one Switch Charges the WFC and the other Switch Short Circuits it using a Variac Transformer. The gist of it, is Charging the Water Fuel Cell then Short Circuiting it, the PLL will do this automatically...

 

The reason Faradays Electrolysis gets Hot is because it is the Load, using the Stanley Meyer method the Load is external to the Water Fuel Cell, it still uses Amperage but externalises the Heat/EM Losses component into a Light Bulb... It's like Charging a Battery and it gets Hot because it is the Load while its Charging but, when you discharge the Battery like in a Laptop the Pentium Chip gets Hot because it's the Load and the Laptop Battery remains Cold to touch, so a Stanley Meyer Water Fuel Cell externalises the Load. Once you get this, then you'll get that the most efficient way to charge a Capacitor that stores Charge is to use Back EMF Im-Pulses then you'll see your efficiencies increase! ... It's all about externalising the Heat component then increasing the efficiency of the Cell, my Cells hooked up to a 3.25 KVA generator- if School Girls in Africa can build this SHIT with Junk Parts anyone in the Western World can build this!?

 

 


... The simplest way for you to hook it up is, instead of the PLL Switch going to the Cell, you need to remove that Switch. You need to directly Switch your Optocouple so you need to remove that Switch and Solder it up yourself because it is a NEGATIVE Switch. Your just making it hard for yourself not removing the Switch from your PPL Circuit because you need that Positive Signal. Once this is done you'll have Two POSITIVE

 

Switch outputs: 1. The Light Emitting Diode & 2. The Positive Signal that previously Switched the NEGATIVE Switch that you have now removed. SIMPLE! If you built your own SCR Circuit you can easily build another one OK. ... You need a NPN so you can collect the Back EMF Im-Pulses off the NEGATIVE at Switch Closure using Blocking Diodes on the Negative. ... You also need a PNP and what this does is it only Switches ON when the Pin is NEGATIVE so the same signal Switches Two separate Switches. The NPN Charges the Cell with Back EMF Im-Pulses and the PNP Short Circuits the Cell with a Light Bulb on the Positive of the Cell to CONSUME all Amperage from the Water Fuel Cell... Its NOT Rocket Science!?


All you do is remove it and you need the Potentential and the Neutral and you can use the one signal to power two seperate Opto-Couples with one Opto for the NPN which has Diodes off the Negative of a Coil to collect the Back-EMF Im-Pulses that go to the Positive of your Water Fuel Cell and the Negative Side of your Water Fuel Cell is connected to the Positive Side of your Coil..

 

. I know this sounds like it doesn't make sense but, the Water Fuel Cell is only being Charged with Back EMF Im-Pulses when the NPN closes. then seperate to this the other Opto is for the PNP which has a Light Bulb on the Positive Side of the Water Fuel Cell then the PNP. SO WHEN THIS IS FED WITH A SQUARE WAVE YOU GET AN ALTERNATING SIGNAL : P, N,P, N, P, N, P ECT.  you can even Postulate the OFF NPN's Back-EMF Im-Pulse takes place while the Short Circuit PNP is On and therefore the Light Bulb is powered by the Back EMF Im-Pulse but it can't because theres no Amperage therefore the Amperage can only come from the Water Fuel Cell Capacitor. during its Short Circuit. You'll know when its built right"

it took a while, but here is my schematic on how i think you can explain what the videomaker is doing.
I use back emf for charging the WFC, as i have done years ago, so i know it works.
In addition, i added the EEC in such a way that the charging of the coil and the discharging of the WFC are in Phase 1.
In Phase 2, the WFC gets the BEMF to charge.

I added the lawton pll output from the hef4050b chip pin2. If the mosfet is still on the board then please remove it (62N15P). Pin 2 goes to that mosfet....
BTW, any other squarewave frequency generator will work. It doesnt have to be a PLL Lawton board.

=======================

How the Covalent OFF Switch works!

Radiant Energy is basically Back-EMF & the purpose of the 8XA Tesla Choke is to dampen the Back-EMF Im-Pulses from detonating (Exploding) the Water. Meyer explains that the High Voltage Field induces ‘Electron Movement’ within the Water Molecules/Atoms causing the Water to Split. In 2005 Naohiro Shimuzu discovered that ultra-short pulses with a width of 300ns has the ability to Split Water. The dominant theory is that, of a Bloch Wall being a pure Potential Field that exists at the centre of the Electrodes that effects the Covalent Bond Electrons (Consumed by a Light Bulb) & this causes the Water to breakdown into HHO Gases.

All you do is you take Water & you expose it to Radiant Energy (Back EMF Im-Pulses) & you get FREE Electricity by the Water Fuel Cell Capacitor acting as a Converter compressing this Radiant Energy into Amperage during the ‘Short Circuits’ & a by-product of this process is FREE HHO Gases.

Basically if NO Electrons are entering from the Cathode, then the Electrons are then ‘RIPPED’ from the Water to fill the Holes in the Anode & as you pull Covalent Bond Electrons from the Water, the Water Molecules will Break Down into HHO Gases. First you’ll have an Ionisation when Water loses one Electron & then you’ll get a Dis-Association when they lose two Electrons. All the Electrons are built up & then they’re drawn off from the Circuit in what is known as the ‘Electron Extraction Circuit’ & this Energy is powering a Light Bulb & an optional Battery Array.

So you get FREE DC Current off the Water Fuel Cell in direct proportion to the amount of HHO Gases that is produced. You could have a Water Fuel Cell & the Current that comes off this Charges a Battery Array & the Batteries could be connected to an Inverter that then Powers an entire House. Allot of people have already used these extracted Electrons from Water to power Motors & Fans.

Firstly Water is an Un-Limited supply of Covalent Bond Electrons & then Secondly as a by-product of this ‘Electron Extraction’ FREE HHO Gases are produced. The decomposition of Matter is really about the Decomposition of ‘Creation’ & then using these extracted Covalent Bond Electrons as a Power Source. The significance of this is ‘Mind Blowing’. A Tesla application of this Technology was called the Cathode Ray Propulsion which decomposes Matter in the direction of Travel. I’d read about the theoretical aspects of this back in the early 90’s which just seemed too Fantastic to believe way back then.Like 10 years ago, somebody who was very good in this Meyer technology said: Steve, you need to go higher in voltage when you pulse a coil.
More then 100v.
He also said that the system would create electricity and that the hho gas was more like a by product....

Now we are trying to setup a bemf system with an eec circuit, i more and more understand it.

As your voltage source moves past zero deg. it has 0 volts of output. However, the voltage is increasing quickly. So, the electric field strength in the dielectric of the cap is changing quickly, and as the field get's stronger, it pushes more electrons out fo the positive side plate (due to increasing electric force on them created by the field). It's important here to realize that a cap is an open circuit essentially, just a specially shaped one. Therefore, current does not flow through a capacitor (ideal one here, we can talk about effect of leakage later if you like), but rather to or from one plate or the other. This causes an electric field to build in the dielectric which affects the free electrons on the other plate via electric force.

\

To explain all that physics, we need to get into Guass' law, etc. so I won't do that here. Each plate is a relatively large chunk of conductive metal, so lots of free electrons exist in it. Many many more than are involved in a reasonable level of current flow. So, the voltage difference between plates, generated by your source will push free electrons from the negative side of the source onto the plate it's connected to. This builds an electric field within the dielectric of the cap such that electrons are pushed by the electric force out of the opposite plate. The circuit carries them back to the positive leg of your source.

 

As more and more charge is pushed into the negative plate, the field grows stronger and more electrons are pushed off the other plate. However, since the rate of change of voltage is slowing as we reach max voltage (at 90 deg), our field strength is still increasing, but more slowly all the time. For that reason, fewer and fewer electrons are pushed off the positive plate per unit time (so current flow is getting smaller). At the point of max voltage, the rate of voltage change is zero, so there are zero more electrons being pushed off that positive plate. At that point the voltage begins to fall ,and the field weakens.

 

This allows some of the pushed out electrons from the positive plate to come back into it. As the voltage rate of change accelerates and the voltage itself falls back toward zero volts, the rate at which electrons return to the positive plate accelerates (current rises). When the voltage is at zero, it's changing at it's max rate, so you have max current flow in the circuit (electrons are coming back to the plate as fast as they ever will for this circuit). The other half of the waveform (negative lobe of the voltage sinusoid) is the same, but switch the plates I'm calling negative and positive since voltage reverses at this point (current doesn't of course, it reversed at the 90 deg point, and will again at 270).

I suppose it could be written up more elegantly, but do you get my meaning here. Can you picture the effect of the field within the cap's dielectric and it's relationship to to electrons flowing out of or into the plates? (positive and negative voltages are not really that, they just indicate that they are associated with current vectors of opposite direction)

 

What i ment was that i think to understand that when we discharge a watercell, i removes free electrons from the blochwall and so on....
So more current and voltage out then in.....

 

MOT.png
Free Energy.png

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.

generator puts out 18 Volts, so the rectified pulses from one of the phases is passed through the MOT's primary, to feed the cell. is it AC No,the voltage and current remain DC due to how the HV coil is shorted with the spark.This induces a very strong magnetic pulse into the primary coil that is hooked in series with the cells and alternator.The spark plug is to induce a collapse of the magnetic field causing a spike in di-electric charge, which then produces the high voltage ... Look up Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses by Charles Proteus Steinmetz

Nice setup but, its a bit silly having the microwave capacitor. The Water Fuel Cell is the Capacitor in series to the Coil & Tesla Choke (upon switch closure the Choke uses its own magnetic field to create a massive B-EMF Im-Pulse) that restricts current flow & provides the Im-Pulse Charge in Stanley Meyers original patent.

 

Also the reason there is no 'Short Circuit' in a Stanley Meyer setup is because a dead short circuit prevents Voltage from cascading.

Making GTNT 

This is just a suggestion but, you could incorporate a NPN Transistor with a Light Bulb in series so that when the + is off the Light Bulb shines but in a pulsed on, off manner to ensure that the Voltages are continually cascaded.

I'm having trouble understanding the circuit - the secondary is usually the hv windings on a transformer but you say a short in the secondary induces a hv in the primary? I don't get it.

The spark plug isn't a short circuit but when the spark jumps you get a huge increase in gas! Shouldn't the secondary circuit operate the electrolyser? And why 3 tubes on the left electrolyser?

 

Each time a spark jumps across the plug,the secondary induces an extremely fast magnetic field change in the primary of the transformer. This causes a very high voltage to be produced by the primary. The primary is being used,as it can deliver a higher current to the cell, than that of the secondary

Just remember that Stanley Meyers 8XA (Tesla Choke) Coil restricts Amperage, prevents the 'Skin Effect' taking place & only allows 'Pure Charge' without the Magnetic stream to pass, in Darwin NT Australia these are referred to as 'Infinite Q Resonators' as they recycle Charge in an Loop.

 

The Meyers 'Electron Extraction Circuit' provides a dead Short Circuit which is the path of least resistance for the Amperage to flow into as the Amperage is restricted by Meyers 8XA Coil... This is very Simple!

 

you really don't want amperage in this system, you want to aim for 0 amps and extremely high voltage. Which is what is happening with the spark plug as it's causing a di-electric charge of high voltage every time that the the spark is released which eliminates the magnetic field.


First effort to replicate the tinman power setup with sparkgap.
Measurement was done on a very simple way with a multimeter.

Later i will install my scopes.
The setup is simple.
1 piece 230v MOT
1 variac
1 capacitor 1 uF
1 sparkplug

The frequency is net related and i have put 1 diode in serie with the MOT and watercell.
Pulsed dc into the cell.
The multimeter measures
0.53 volts acros the cell when the variac is hitting 250v into the primary coil and cell.
Again, the voltage over the cell is very very low.
No gas is produced.
As soon as i put the sparkplug and capacitor in place, i get sparks on the plug.
Suddenly gas is produced!
Voltage over the cell is 0.83v..........

IMG_20180515_142822.jpg
IMG_20180515_201239.jpg
IMG_20180515_141040.jpg

One builder also used the similar setup , this could be done with tesla coils , car coils or mot aka Q Resonator

DDDD.png
Nikola Tesla Electricity Alien

Puharich Input Waveform Input signal: 20-200Hz Sine (I am using 600Hz here) Carrier signal: 200 - 100kHz Sine (I am using 32.1kHz as this is where my cell is resonant during Puharich's stage A)

 

The modulation index here is 0.95. The amplitude of the AM waveform is cycling at ~3 seconds which Puharich says corresponds to the nuclear spin relaxation time (tau/s) of water.

For more details see: http://www.alexpetty.com/2018/07/04/p... Puharich's water splitting process involves a multi-stage treatment of the water.

 

This video shows Stage A. In these results, the resonant frequency was ~29 kHz where the voltage (E) on the dry cell rose from 0 to ~240 Vpp and where the max current (I) fluctuated from 0 to ~870mA.  In this video, the analog scope is showing the 5V output from the pre-amp.

 

The digital scope is showing the amplified output from both sides of the cell. The yellow trace is on the cathode, the blue trace is on the anode.

 

These traces are superimposed on one another. As a next step, I want to adjust Stage A parameters to be better in keeping with Puharich's guidance so that current (I) is 25mA, voltage (E) is 250 Vrms, and where the carrier frequency is closer to 62kHz.

 

The complete list of Puharich's stages are: ---------------

 

Stage A: Dry charging the cell to test integrity of all components and to clean cell surfaces with high voltage electrostatic charge. ---------------

 

Stage B: (which has 5 phases) B.1: Water is added to the cell but not so high as to close the circuit. B.2: Water is added drop by drop until the circuit is closed as it bridges non-insulated surfaces of the cell. B.3:

 

The resonant frequency of the carrier drops, voltage and current drop, and sine wave from Stage A is changed to a rippled square wave. Puharich says this happens because of water's changing RC constant from treatment.

 

According to Puharich, the frequency of the rippled square wave at this stage is a function of its entrainment with water's nuclear spin relaxation constant (tau=3.0 sec). Also, at this phase Puharich says that the square wave exhibits higher order harmonics, each relating to the specific resonances of the water molecule's atoms. B.4:

 

When the water becomes highly polarizes, the waveform exhibits complete half-wave rectification.

 

Slight electrolysis is evident by the appearance of a faint vapor. Something else interesting happens at this stage. The reverse threshold is met.

 

This can be tested by opening the circuit once again by removing some of the water in the cell until the water level falls below the cathode's insulation line. Voltage and current will then drop to zero, and the rippled square wave will disappear, but it will give way to positive uni-polar pulses occurring within the water itself.

 

B.5: Through the process given above, the water is reshaped into a more rigid, higher energy state exhibiting a tetrahedral conformation given by a bond angle shift from 104 degrees to 109 degrees and 28 minutes. According to Puharich, it is only at this point that resonance can be applied to bring about thermodynamically efficient water splitting. ---------------

 

Stage C: A new waveform is generated that matches the effects seen during stage B.

 

This causes the rippled square wave to give way to a rippled sawtooth wave. The appearance of 4 higher order harmonics (carrier frequency 3980Hz, OHM1: 7960Hz, OHM2: 15,920Hz, OHM3: 31,840Hz, OHM4: 63,690Hz) indicate the resonance of each apice of the molecular tetrahedron during efficient electrolysis. Puahrich stated that gas being formed using this method exhibit a centripetal "pearl chain formation" that looks like the "spokes of a wheel". ---------------

 

Stage D: Rapid hydrolysis slows as a barrier potential is formed after about 27 minutes of operation. ---------------

 

Stage E: A barrier to the operation of the effect arises as the result of microscopic gas bubbles forming on the cell plates. ---------------

 

Stage F: Mechanical vibration (tapping) can be used to "shake the bubbles free" and clear the plates for continued operation. --------------- Demonstrations of stages B through F to come.

Stanley A Meyer Single Cell.jpg
WATER FUEL - Continuous electrolysis - W

Secure Supplies Kw / kg

194.2cc/min @ 1amp 

(194.2cc/min @ 1amp ) x 60 min .x 4.0 amp leakage = 46,600 cc/hr 60 amp per hr x 110 v

194.2 cc/min =68 cc/min = 126.2 divide by 68 =1.85

or 185% WFC Improvement over prior art  @ 1 atm pressure

Convert cc to kg

Hydrogen weighs 8.2 × 10-5 gram per cubic centimeter 

or 0.082 kilogram per cubic meter,

 

i.e. density of hydrogen is equal to 0.082 kg/m³; at 0°C 32°F

or 273.15K  at standard atmospheric pressure.

So 46,600 cc x 0.082 kg per cc =  3.8212 kg per hr at 110v x 60 amp per hr  = 6,600kw

 

Kw per  Hr  per Kg Per Hr 

===============================

 

Stanley A Meyer 7141263I.jpg
Stanley A Meyer 7141247U.jpg
Stanley A Meyer 7139450A.jpg

Build and Testing of
WaterFuel Cell WFC.

Notes in word document, so it is easy for me to find things and to look back on what has been done. 

INcluded are  things that work and things that did not and the tools used. 

The attached document converted to a PDF is the one   build of the cell including the acrylic tube and end caps and capacitor tubes. 

 

Besides information on the construction, Included are  tests of the capacitors.  As  posted some of earlier steps in this process in other threads, It  will not be repeated in those steps in this tread as they are already in the attachment. There will be updates the attachment with new information as well as posting it in thread below.

Cell Made is 6 tube sets 5 ½” outer and 6” inner and checked capacitance on each of them in air, distilled water and city tap water.  That information has already been posted and in document and will not be repeated here. 

Post below with cover testing of 8 ½” outer and 9” inner tubes. 

Test setup.png

TESTS ON LONGER TUBE
I wanted to see how length of tube effected capacitance of using the 8.5” outer tube and the 9” inner tube and doing taking some more reading.  As I did not want to cut multiple lengths, I decided to slide the inner tube into the outer tube.
 
To do this test I make what I call a slider spacer which fits on end of inner tube and has fins that center inner tube inside outer tube.  I already had a spacer for the outside end I had made from earlier tests.

Note: When doing this I found that tube still had a sight ring from using pipe cutter on each end.  I used pipe reamer to remove did not do good enough job initially.
Items used during testing  First picture shows items used and second test setup, Outer tube connection is through setup screw with stainless spring.

Initial test results

Length inserted in distilled water      in air
5.0”                             46.45pF
5.5”          10.16nF                           50.06pF
6.0”         11.94nF            55.45pF
6.5”         13.68nF            61.19pF
7.0”         15.27nF            65.02pF
7.5”         17.84nF            69.62pF
8.0”         18.82nF            72.21pF
8.5”         20.68nF            76.23pF
9.0”                             77.82pF
As expect this acts as a variable capacitor value changes approximately 4pF ever 1/2 inch or air.
Note:  The 9” should be the same as the 8.5” as inner tube is now sticking out the bottom.
Note:  Meter was reset before for each reading as recommended in manual.
Note:  Need to take care as putting hand close to test setup raise reading.

Items being tested.JPG
Cell parts.png

Cell outer tube and parts

1-   12” acrylic tube 4” ID 4.5” OD from McMasters (Note: They have 2 versions of this tube this one and on that has 4” ID and 4.25” OD. I choose the large as it fits standard DWV fittings)
2-   4” DWV end connector one for each end slip connector with other end threaded (2) fits standard DWV pipe which has OD of 4 1/2”
3-   Flat screw cap for bottom has slot to tighten
4-   Screw cap for top has raised square nut to tighten
5-   3D printed holder for seven I/2” tubes
6-   1.5”x ¼” x 20 stainless hex set screw,  End of screw drilled with 3mm hole to hold spring
7-   10mm x 3mm stainless spring
8-   ¼” x 20 Stainless steel lock nut

Stanley table reference.png

Reason I was doing this is I want to know what size tube I need to give results at 5khz.

I have been working mostly on basis of open tube resonance calculation. Im not sure if your approach is different, but, it might be insightful. http://www.gigaphysics.com/swift_resonance.html although I prefer imperial measurement.

I always wondered when I was looking at Joe Cell years ago if he had perfect pitch and use to make cell resonate.  Not sure if that is case here based on test on long tube and moving it in and out to change capacitance I wonder if that is the purpose of the slots in the picture?

Stanley A Meyer WFC with LED Photon INjection h2 (6).png
Stanley A Meyer WFC with LED Photon INjection h2 (2).png
Stanley A Meyer WFC with LED Photon INjection h2 (4).png
Stanley A Meyer WFC with LED Photon INjection h2 (1).png
Stanley A Meyer WFC with LED Photon INjection h2 (5).png

Photon Injected Resonant Cavity

Stan had a "triple stack" which was composed of three individual resonant cavities stacked on top one another. These were large and made of machined Delrin. At the top of each was a circular PCB composed of 5mm 660nm LEDs. 660nm LEDs were seen throughout Meyer's technology. In an effort to miniaturize, and ease investigations for such, I have designed a version that uses the tube dimensions of the small resonant cavities.

FINISHED ASSEMBLY:

 

Body of the unit. Received 4 LED PCBs at a 90 degree displacement around the periphery. Internal has an acrylic "lens", 0.75" outer electrode, and 0.50" inner electrode coaxially placed relative to one another. Two 1/4" holes are 180 degrees displaced relative to one another for mounting via nylon all thread rod. Hole for connections to the internal tubes are provided (on seen here for 0.75") on the side. Also, using a new method, at the bottom of the body for the inner electrode (see at bottom).

3D PRINT FILES

Photon Injected Resonant Cavity Body.stl

Tube LED Groove Stencil.stl

Acrylic Lens For Mold.stl

INNER ELECTRODE:

1/2" (0.500") outside diameter. 3.50" long. T-304 stainless steel tube. 0.060" wall.

OUTER ELECTRODE:

 3/4" (0.75") outside diameter. 3.00" long. T-304 stainless steel. 0.035" wall. Machining these slots can become pricey. Therefor, a stencil that slides over the electrode can be used to manually mark the area for the grooves and cut them out in an alternative fashion.

ACRYLIC LENS:

Acrylic lens is made from casting resin. This below would be finished product. Included is the hole for connecting to 3/4" electrode from outside. STL would be template for making a master mold. 

LED PCB:

Representation of a PCB manufactured. Composed of 10 660nm - 5mm LEDs

Stanley A Meyer WFC with LED Photon INjection h2 (3).png
download.png

Molecule & Gas Atom Ionization - Raising H+ to 13.6 electronVolts

If you're looking to orient water molecules in an electric field, a relatively modest electric field can achieve this because water is a polar molecule. To align a water molecule, an electric field on the order of 1 kV/cm is often more than enough. Given a 1/8" gap (approximately 0.318 cm), this would equate to a voltage of approximately 318 volts.

In its neutral state, a hydrogen atom is not electropositive. The hydrogen atom consists of one proton and one electron, and it is electrically neutral because the positive charge of the proton balances the negative charge of the electron. However, hydrogen can become a positive ion (a proton) if it loses its electron, such as through ionization.

If you're dealing with ionized hydrogen (protons), these would indeed be repelled by a positive electric field and attracted to a negative one. If the hydrogen atoms are not ionized, they would not be significantly affected by an electric field because they are overall electrically neutral.

If you're trying to manipulate neutral hydrogen atoms with an electric field, you may need to ionize them first. Ionization typically requires a significant amount of energy and can be achieved in various ways, such as with a high voltage, intense light, or high temperatures.

The process of converting a neutral hydrogen atom into a positively charged ion (a proton, H+) is called ionization. For hydrogen, this involves removing the single electron from the atom. There are several methods that can be used to achieve this:

  1. Electrical Discharge: Passing a high-voltage electric current through the gas can strip electrons from their parent atoms, creating ions. This is the principle behind techniques like glow discharge and arc discharge.

  2. Electron Impact: High-energy electrons can knock electrons off atoms to create ions. This often happens in devices like mass spectrometers.

  3. Photoionization: High-energy photons (such as ultraviolet light or X-rays) can also ionize atoms by knocking off electrons.

  4. Thermal Ionization: At very high temperatures, the kinetic energy of the atoms can be high enough to cause ionization. This is what happens in the sun and other stars.

  5. Chemical Ionization: Certain chemical reactions can result in ionization. For example, some strong acids can ionize hydrogen.

 

Sure, let's delve deeper into these three methods:

 

  1. Electrical Discharge Ionization: This is the process of ionizing a gas by applying a high voltage between two electrodes. When the voltage is sufficiently high, it can accelerate free electrons, which then collide with neutral gas atoms. If the kinetic energy of the electron is high enough, it can knock an electron off the atom, creating an ion. This process can create a plasma, a gas of ions and free electrons.

    Glow discharge and arc discharge are two forms of electrical discharge. Glow discharge operates at lower pressures and voltages, while arc discharge operates at higher pressures and voltages.

    In your context, you could potentially use an electrical discharge to ionize your hydrogen gas. You would need to carefully contain and control the discharge to ensure safety, as the process can produce heat and UV light.

  1. Electron Impact Ionization (also known as Collision Ionization): This method is similar to electrical discharge but is usually discussed in the context of a beam of high-energy electrons colliding with a gas. When a high-energy electron collides with a neutral atom, it can knock off one of the atom's electrons, creating an ion.

    This method is often used in instruments like mass spectrometers to ionize samples. It's typically used in vacuum conditions, as the mean free path of the electrons needs to be long enough for them to gain sufficient energy before they collide with the atoms.

  2. Photoionization: This is the process of ionizing an atom using photons, which are particles of light. When a photon with enough energy collides with an atom, it can knock an electron off the atom, creating an ion. The minimum energy required to ionize the atom is called the ionization energy.

    For hydrogen, the ionization energy is 13.6 electron volts (eV), which corresponds to ultraviolet light with a wavelength of about 91.2 nm. So you would need light of this energy or higher to photoionize hydrogen. Photoionization can be a very clean method of ionization, as it doesn't introduce any new particles into the system. However, producing light of the required energy can be challenging. UV lasers can do this, but they tend to be expensive and require careful handling due to the hazards of UV light.

Again, all of these methods involve significant energy and can be hazardous if not handled correctly. Always follow appropriate safety procedures, and consider consulting with an expert if you're unsure.

The electronvolt (eV) is a unit of energy that is often used in the context of atoms and subatomic particles, like electrons. One electronvolt is defined as the amount of kinetic energy gained (or lost) by a single electron accelerating from rest through an electric potential difference of one volt.

So, when we say that the ionization energy of hydrogen is about 13.6 eV, it means that it takes 13.6 eV of energy to remove an electron from a hydrogen atom (in its ground state).

This energy isn't directly related to the input voltage of a circuit or device. The input voltage can create an electric field, and this field can accelerate charged particles. If a charged particle (like an electron) accelerates through a voltage difference of one volt, it will gain (or lose) an energy of one electronvolt.

But to use voltage to ionize an atom, you need a situation where free electrons can be accelerated by the electric field to gain enough kinetic energy.

 

This can happen in an electrical discharge, for example, where a high voltage can ionize a gas. The voltage needed to achieve this can be much higher than the ionization energy of the atoms (in eV), due to inefficiencies and losses in the process. The specific voltage needed can depend on many factors, such as the pressure and composition of the gas, the distance between the electrodes, and the design of the device.

As always, dealing with high voltages and ionization processes can involve significant hazards, and it's important to follow all relevant safety procedures and guidelines.

The water capacitor is 2 - 3" tubes, 1/2" inner and 3/4" outer SS304L. the gap is approx 1/8". what do the electric field voltage requirements look like for this?

The electric field strength (E) in a capacitor is given by the formula E = V/d, where V is the voltage across the capacitor and d is the distance between the plates (or in this case, tubes). The electric field is usually measured in volts per meter (V/m).

The 1/8" gap between your tubes is about 0.003175 meters. If you were to apply a voltage of 1 volt across the tubes, the electric field strength would be E = 1V / 0.003175m = 315 V/m.

If you're looking to ionize hydrogen, as discussed earlier, you'd need an electric field that's strong enough to give electrons enough energy to escape their atoms. This would likely require a field on the order of kilovolts per millimeter or higher. For a 1/8" (about 3.175mm) gap, this could mean a voltage of several kilovolts.

However, creating such a strong electric field in a gas at atmospheric pressure would likely lead to electrical breakdown and a spark or arc, rather than ionization of individual atoms. To achieve controlled ionization, you would typically need a vacuum or very low pressure, so the mean free path of the electrons is long enough for them to gain sufficient energy before they collide with another atom.

If you're simply looking to align water molecules with an electric field, you would not need such a high field strength. A field of a few kV/m (equivalent to a few volts across the tubes) could be sufficient.

 

In any case, working with high voltages can be dangerous, and it's important to take all necessary safety precautions. Consider consulting with an expert or professional if you're unsure.

 

what field strength is needed to apply the 13.6eV

In order to understand how much field strength is required to apply the 13.6 electronvolt (eV) needed to ionize a hydrogen atom, we need to take into account the concept of work done.

The work done (W) on a particle by an electric field as it moves through a distance (d) is given by W = qEd, where q is the charge of the particle and E is the electric field strength. If we want to give an electron an energy of 13.6 eV, we can set W equal to this value.

The charge of an electron (q) is about 1.6 x 10^-19 Coulombs. So, if we want to give an electron an energy of 13.6 eV (which is about 2.18 x 10^-18 Joules), we can rearrange the equation to solve for E:

E = W / (q*d) = (2.18 x 10^-18 J) / [(1.6 x 10^-19 C) * d]

For a 1/8" (about 0.003175 m) gap, this gives:

E = (2.18 x 10^-18 J) / [(1.6 x 10^-19 C) * 0.003175 m] ≈ 4.3 x 10^7 V/m

This means that you would need an electric field of about 43 million volts per meter to give an electron an energy of 13.6 eV over a distance of 1/8". That corresponds to a voltage of approximately 136.5 kV across the 1/8" gap.

 

However, these calculations are a simplification, and they assume that the electron is free to move across the entire gap without any collisions. In reality, the mean free path of an electron (the average distance it can travel before colliding with an atom) in air at atmospheric pressure is much less than 1/8", and so the electron would not be able to gain this much energy before it collided with an atom.

Therefore, to achieve ionization in a controlled manner, you would typically need a vacuum or very low pressure, and the voltage required would depend on the specific conditions.

As always, working with high voltages can be dangerous, and it's important to follow all necessary safety precautions. Consult with an expert or professional if you're unsure.

 

ok how about a 1/16" gap

With a reduced gap distance of 1/16" or approximately 0.0015875 meters, we use the same formula for the electric field:

E = W / (q*d)

To calculate the required voltage (V), we remember that electric field strength (E) is voltage (V) divided by distance (d). So we can rearrange the formula to find V = E*d:

V = E*d = W / q

Using the numbers we established before (W = 2.18 x 10^-18 J and q = 1.6 x 10^-19 C), we find:

V = (2.18 x 10^-18 J) / (1.6 x 10^-19 C) ≈ 13.625 kV

So the voltage required across the 1/16" gap to provide an electron with 13.6 eV of energy would be approximately 13.625 kV.

 

Again, in reality, achieving ionization under atmospheric pressure conditions would likely require higher voltages due to factors like electron collision and energy loss. Always take proper precautions when dealing with high voltage systems.

 

Te result is a magnitude of 10

1/16" = 13.6kV = 13.6eV

1/8" = 136.5kV = 13.6eV

bottom of page